I haven’t watched Friends or seen the wiki pages for a while but after reading the Ross and Rachel page, it seems so biased and not in a good way. I thought this wiki is supposed to be neutral and just state facts and although in the breakdown on the seasons it is like that but in the Joey TV series and beyond part and the infobox, it is clearly not that. It’s seems like it was written by someone who hates the couple and tries to pass their opinion to state as facts. “The lack of understanding, the lack of respect, the lack of communication, and the lack of trust between Ross and Rachel” is one good example.

I except we don’t know what happened after The Last One and I also expect that crew members and actors are not reliable sources but stating that Ross and Rachel were only back together for (1 day) is clearly wrong. We don’t know whether the next morning is the morning we saw everyone leaving Monica’s apartment. It could be a few days after. I think we should state that they are “boyfriend and girlfriend” since we know that. The editor never stated that both characters were very different people from when they broke up in season 3. That needs to be written. By season 10, the lack of understanding, trust and communication quote was practically non-existent.

Also in the Joey TV series and beyond section, whoever edited that part (which wasn’t there when I last looked at the page) kept saying that Rachel remarried Ross and not “Ross and Rachel re-married each other”. It like the editor wants to enforce it was one-sided.

Another thing about that section is that it kept implying that they would break up. Nothing in that section tried to imply that they’d stayed together. We have to keep a balanced view on what happened afterwards.

The quote on the first episode of Joey "I was happy in New York and I tried to keep everything the same but things kept changing. All of my friends got married and had kids and moved on" stated all the interpretations possible to imply that Joey was not talking about Ross and Rachel being together and not vice versa. Some of the points the editor made are clearly biased and needs to be removed like the one about “having kids and moving on” to Rachel and not Ross and Ross and Rachel marrying different people. In that short amount of time, that’s clearly impossible. Even in season 4, Ross and Rachel were having doubts on their decisions. Like said above, they are very different people from what they were back then. They have a baby together.

The editor never stated that later in the series Joey told Alex “I've only said I love you to one woman and she was pregnant with my best friend’s baby and they ended up together” which reinforced the fact that Ross and Rachel were still together at least a year after the series finale. Also, the editor never stated that the Joey said that quote (The “I was happy in New York quote)) in September, not May. That’s 4 months after the final episode. If Ross and Rachel broke up, Joey would have known that and not said the quote with Alex later in the series. Also Joey never said he left on the day of the finale.

The point that says that Ross and Rachel not thinking about marriage and stating that if they were “the show wouldn't have ended just before such a major event” is such a poor written point. Have the editor seen the Adventure Time finale?

I think that section needs to be re-written and remove all the biasness so that it would have a neutral view. Do you think it is biased and needs to be re-written? I think so.